Australia’s nearly 612,000 self-managed super funds hold a total of A$992 million in cryptocurrencies
According to statistics released by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) on November 26, as of the end of the third quarter in September, nearly 612,000 self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) held a total of $658.6 million (approximately AUD 992 million) in cryptocurrency, a 400% increase compared to the same period in 2019 ($131.5 million, approximately AUD 198 million).
In Australia, self-managed superannuation funds (also known as private pension funds) allow individuals to control the investment of their retirement funds. These retirement plans are regulated by the Australian Taxation Office, and SMSFs still need to comply with pension regulations.
Danny Talwar, head of tax at cryptocurrency tax service provider Koinly, said this makes cryptocurrency the "fastest-growing asset class" in SMSFs.
Talwar also emphasized that cryptocurrency accounts for only 0.1% of the total net assets held by Australian SMSFs. He also pointed out that small SMSFs often have a higher proportion of cryptocurrency in their investment portfolios. (Cointelegraph)
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
XRP Price Set for Breakout Amid Parallels to 2017’s Epic Rally
MAJORUSDT now launched for futures trading and trading bots
Bitget has launched MAJORUSDT for futures trading with a maximum leverage of 20, along with support for futures trading bots, on November 28, 2024 (UTC+8). Welcome to try futures trading via our official website (www.bitget.com) or Bitget APP. MAJORUSDT-M perpetual futures: Parameters Details Listi
Top Altcoins with Rising Sentiment Post-Market Recovery
Pump Science apologizes after GitHub key leak leads to fraudulent tokens
Share link:In this post: The DeSci platform Pump Science has warned its users not to trust any tokens launched using its Pump.fun profile. Pump Science said it would never launch its tokens on Pump.fun. While Pump Science holds BuilderZ partially responsible for the security breach, it does not think BuilderZ was the attacker.