Three addresses transfer UMA to CEX after UMA rises
UMA project team announced the launch of a new product next week to recover tens of millions of dollars in losses caused by MEV in lending agreements. UMA rose 241% (from $1.97 to $6.73) as a result. Three addresses transferred UMA to CEX after the price increase and made a profit.
·Address 0x3b8 withdrew 190,168 UMA (worth $370,000) from Binance at a price of $1.97 on November 28, 2023, and transferred it back to Binance at a price of $3.7 on January 19, realizing a profit of $330,000 (+88%).
·Address 0x276 withdrew 374,989 UMA (worth $770,000) from Coinbase Prime at a price of $2.06 a year ago, and transferred 187,495 UMA (worth $1 million) back to Coinbase Prime at a price of $5.33 on January 20, realizing a profit of $610,000 (+158%).
·borntoolate.eth staked 1.34 million UMA (worth $6.38 million), withdrew 142,491 UMA (worth $760,000) as a staking reward on January 20, and transferred it to Coinbase at a price of $5.33.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
XRP Price Set for Breakout Amid Parallels to 2017’s Epic Rally
MAJORUSDT now launched for futures trading and trading bots
Bitget has launched MAJORUSDT for futures trading with a maximum leverage of 20, along with support for futures trading bots, on November 28, 2024 (UTC+8). Welcome to try futures trading via our official website (www.bitget.com) or Bitget APP. MAJORUSDT-M perpetual futures: Parameters Details Listi
Top Altcoins with Rising Sentiment Post-Market Recovery
Pump Science apologizes after GitHub key leak leads to fraudulent tokens
Share link:In this post: The DeSci platform Pump Science has warned its users not to trust any tokens launched using its Pump.fun profile. Pump Science said it would never launch its tokens on Pump.fun. While Pump Science holds BuilderZ partially responsible for the security breach, it does not think BuilderZ was the attacker.