MarginFi outflows $190M as CEO rage quits amid token controversy
Nearly $200 million of user funds have exited Solana-based lending protocol MarginFi over the last two days amid an abrupt resignation of the platform’s CEO and followed by accusations of wrongdoing from its competitors.
On April 10, the now-former CEO of MarginFi, Edgar Pavlovsky, suddenly announced he had resigned from MarginFi, citing disputes that had arisen from both within his firm and from outside of it.
“I resigned from mrgn today. From working on marginfi, from the research arm, from it all," said Pavlovsky, adding:
“I don't agree with the way things have been done internally or externally.”Source: Edgar Pavlovsky
Hours earlier, Pavlovsky had been trading blows with users on X who had been requesting that the protocol launch its long-anticipated MRGN governance token.
“After today, feels maximally right to push back any kind of token. Will see what I can do internally to brick this,” wrote Pavlovsky in a now-deleted post to X on April 11, which also saw a heated response from the community.
Net outflows from MarginFi have topped $191 million in the last 48 hours. Source: Dune AnalyticsIn the wake of the controversy — seemingly worsened by a stream of public insults from the former CEO — withdrawals from MarginFi have reached as high as $191 million in the last 48 hours, according to Dune Analytics data .
Competing protocols accuse MarginFi of spreading lies
The controversy only escalated as the teams from other Solana-based lending protocols began posting accusations that the MarginFi protocol hadn’t been meeting their stated requirements.
SolBlaze claimed that MarginFi had allegedly failed to replenish BLZE token emissions for its users. Failing to replenish emissions for the BLZE token meant that BLZE lenders were not paid yield on their deposits within a specific time frame.
MarginFi co-founder MacBrennan Peet however defended against the claims, arguing that recent delays were due to “chain congestion” and user safety concerns.
Peet described SolBlaze’s accusations as “completely wrong” and claimed his platform had consistently paid out more than its required amount to BLZE lenders and borrowers.
Related: SushiSwap DAO backs transition to ‘Labs model’ in preliminary vote
“Marginfi has failed to replenish BLZE over the last 3 days, not three weeks. Yes, this is because of chain congestion and prioritizing user safety,” he added.
Meanwhile, Solend founder Rooter took to X to share accusations that MarginFi has allegedly attempted to “blackball” Solend by spreading inaccurate information about Solend’s total value locked and attacking its oracles.
Despite the internal discord that was catapulted into public view, MarginFi has reassured its users that all of its products were unaffected by Pavlovsky’s departure, adding that the team remained committed to growing the protocol moving forward.
The team has still not informed its users when the MRGN token will be launched.
Magazine: ‘SEAL 911’ team of white hats formed to fight crypto hacks in real time
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
New Meme Coin Captures Whale Attention With 9,200% Gains, Leaving BONK and PEPE Behind!
Ethereum’s Reign Could Be Over: These 4 Powerful Altcoins Are Ready to Dominate the Market
Trump and Wall Street: How long will the love affair last?
Share link:In this post: Wall Street loved Trump’s win at first—stocks jumped, Bitcoin soared, and borrowing costs hit rock bottom, but some sectors started cracking fast. Tax cuts and deregulation made financial and energy stocks shoot up, but tariffs and plans to deport workers freaked out economists and markets. Tariffs mean higher prices for Americans, and even Walmart’s warning it’ll have to raise prices if Trump pushes through with his trade war.
OpenAI could face a bigger problem than Elon Musk’s lawsuit against it
Share link:In this post: OpenAI’s much bigger threat comes from government regulation since it has more power than Elon Musk. If the government chooses to investigate the shift of OpenAI from a non-profit to a Public Benefit Corporation, there will be severe repercussions. The AI company’s dual model has sparked controversies