Data comparison of Aethir, Sopon, and CARV, which one has the highest revenue from node sales?
Original title: "Which node sales company is the most sincere? Data comparison of Aethir, Sopon, and CARV"
Original author: Riyue Xiaochu, crypto KOL
First of all, let's understand node sales. Node sales are actually a new way of selling tokens. It is a way for multiple parties to benefit. For projects, a decentralized network itself requires a large number of nodes. For project parties, node sales have also become a new way of financing. For us retail investors, current projects are all launched at high valuations by institutions, and it is difficult for the secondary market to have good opportunities to make money. And participating in node sales means investing in the project before it goes public.
In general, from the perspective of node token rewards, CARV is the most generous. 25% of the total reward nodes are the most allocated among the three, and 12.5% of the total tokens are released in the first year of the bull market, which is more than twice that of the other two projects.
From the sales situation, Sophon sold 30,000 ETH and Aethir sold 40,000 ETH. CARV is about to start and is not expected to be too bad. You can use this as a reference.
1 Project Introduction
Aethir is a decentralized computing power platform. Aethir aims to build a scalable, decentralized cloud infrastructure (DCI). The network helps game and artificial intelligence companies, regardless of size, to deliver products directly to consumers, regardless of where they are or what hardware they have. Aethir solves the problem of market fragmentation in a decentralized cloud way.
Sophon is an entertainment-centric ecosystem built as a modular rollup using zkSync's hyperchain technology. As a zkSync hyperchain utilizing ZK Stack, Sophon is designed to be customized for any high-throughput application, such as artificial intelligence and gaming applications.
CARV aims to build the largest modular data layer to provide data services for GameFi and AI. It revolutionizes the way data is used and shared by ensuring that privacy, ownership, and control are firmly in the hands of individuals, creating a future where data creates value for everyone. CARV already has 2.5 million registered users, 1.2 million monthly active users, and more than 750 game and artificial intelligence companies have integrated into the CARV ecosystem
2 Node Token Total
CARV has a total of 1 billion tokens, 25% of which are used as rewards for nodes.
Aethir has a total of 42 billion tokens, 15% of which are used as rewards for nodes.
Sopon has not yet announced its total tokens, 20% of which are used as rewards for nodes.
Xai has a total of 2.5 billion tokens, 42.09% of which are used for DAC and nodes.
So 42.09% of Xai is used for nodes and DAC, but the overall rewards for nodes are also relatively high. Among the recent node sales projects, CARV has the largest total number of tokens for node rewards.
3 Node release tokens in the first year
The release of node tokens is most critical in the first year. Because the next year is likely to be a bull market, the price will be better. And then it may enter a bear market, and the release of tokens is accumulating, plus institutions and teams have begun to unlock, so it is normal for the price of the currency to fall by 10 times. So the release of nodes focuses on how many coins can be mined in a year.
The 42.09% allocated by Xai is composed of two parts. The specific number of nodes released is calculated based on the node release chart given by the official. The initial daily release of Xai is 1.712 million. When the circulation reaches 1.25 billion (the official estimate is 5-6 months after TGE), 856,000 will be released daily. According to calculations, Xai will release about 440 million tokens in the first year, of which 85% will be used for node rewards, which is 374 million, accounting for about 14.98% of the total.
CARV's node reward is 25%, but its token release is relatively fast. According to the official white paper, the release of CARV tokens in the first year is 50%, which is 12.5% of the total. It is basically the same as Xai
Aethir's release rules are not clear, but it only states that there is a 4-year release period. Node rewards are only 15% of the total, and it is expected to be around 5%~7% in the first year. The fundamental reason is that Aethir has reserved a large part of the rewards for computing power providers for mining.
Sopon's node rewards are released linearly for three years, and 27.78% is released in the first year, which is 5.56% of the total tokens.
For node token rewards, CARV released 12.5% in the first year, the most among the three projects. Aethir and Sopon only gave nodes 5% of the total, which is much less.
4 Redemption period of node tokens
After the node mines the tokens, you will not get the tokens immediately, but esXai, vATH, and veCARV. There is a certain redemption period to convert them into tokens that can be bought and sold on the exchange.
For Xai, it takes 180 days to convert esXai into Xai, and there are two options. If you convert it in 15 days, you can only get 25% of Xai. If you convert it in 90 days, you can get 62.5% of Xai.
The rule of Aethir is that if you redeem it within 30 days, you can only get 25%, and the default is 180 days of redemption.
For CARV, it takes 150 days to convert veCARV into CARV, and there are two options. If you convert it in 15 days, you can only get 25% of Xai. If it is 90 days, you can get 60%% of CARV.
The node release of Sopon has not been announced.
In general, the three projects have relatively long redemption periods, and the three projects are basically the same. If you want to distinguish them, CARV will have a slight advantage. Its 150-day redemption is one month shorter than XAI and ATH's 180 days.
5 Unlocking of other tokens in the first year
In addition to the node rewards, we also need to consider the unlocking of other tokens. Because the release of other tokens will increase the inflation rate.
In the token distribution, in addition to the node mining part, it is often divided into three parts. One part is required by the project, such as market making, operational activities, etc. This part is often released in large quantities during TGE, so there is no need to pay too much attention. The second part is ecological rewards, community, foundation, etc. This part is often due to the long-term development of the project, and Dao voting is required for use. The third part is the release of institutions and teams. This part needs special consideration.
In this regard, Xai is not very friendly. Teams and institutions start unlocking 6 months after TGE, releasing about 1.5% of the total tokens per month. The reward tokens of nodes are open for redemption about 2 months after TGE, plus a redemption period of 6 months. This means that teams and institutions have a large number of chips circulating in the market before nodes.
CARV investors start unlocking 6 months after TGE, and the team starts unlocking 9 months after TGE. The unlocking conditions are better than Xai, and it should be noted that the redemption period of CARV's node mining tokens is 5 months, so the node tokens are unlocked earlier than investors.
The chips of Aethir and Sopon institutions and teams have a 12-month lock-up period. However, in Aethir's token model, 35% of the total is GPU, which is released synchronously with the nodes, which means that twice as many chips as nodes are unlocked together.
6 Node Sales
In terms of node sales, Xai has sold 35,155 nodes, with a sales amount of 13,080 ETH, worth 400 million US dollars, and the average cost of the node is 0.372 ETH. The node price has risen from the lowest 0.133 ETH to 1.43 ETH, a little more than 10 times.
Aethir has sold 74,040 nodes, with a sales amount of 41,627 ETH, worth 130 million US dollars. The average cost of a node is 0.56 ETH. The node price has risen 14 times from the lowest 0.1259 ETH to 1.8232 ETH.
Sophon has sold 121,261 nodes, with a sales amount of 31,087 ETH, worth 96 million US dollars. The average cost of a node is 0.256 ETH.
For node sales, XAI can be said to be the beginning of this round, and most of the projects selling nodes are learning from XAI. However, the data of XAI itself is not good, because when XAI was sold, the market was not very hot. And because XAI is the first time, many people have concerns about this form. Moreover, many people who participated in the GALA node in 2021 have not yet recovered their investment. However, after XAI was listed on Binance, the benefits of participating in the early nodes were lucrative, which brought many users to the projects that later sold nodes.
Aethir's node sales not only benefited from XAI's money-making effect, but also when the AI sector was at its peak. For other projects with good quality, the possible results are between XAI and Aethir.
7 Summary
1 From the perspective of the project, Aethir, Sopon, and CARV are not in the same track and cannot be directly compared. But each has its own advantages. Aethir belongs to the AI track and has scarce GPU computing power, which is the hottest sector at the moment. Sopon's project is more like a game that was quickly put together while the market was good. But it has a project done by the original founder of zksyc, and its popularity and resources in the circle are very rich. CARV has accumulated for many years, has grown rapidly, and has a large number of users and ecological projects.
2 From the perspective of node sales, CARV is the most generous, with 25% of the total reward nodes being the largest allocation among the three, and releasing 12.5% of the total tokens in the first year of the bull market, more than twice the other two projects.
3 From the sales situation, Sophon sold 30,000 ETH and Aethir sold 40,000 ETH. CARV is about to start, and it is not expected to be too bad. You can use this as a reference.
Original link
欢迎加入律动 BlockBeats 官方社群:
Telegram 订阅群: https://t.me/theblockbeats
Telegram 交流群: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App
Twitter 官方账号: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.