A User Made a Huge Mistake on the Ethereum Network! This Mistake Cost Him $90,000!
An anonymous user accidentally paid 34.26 ETH ($89,200) in ETH gas fees while transferring 0.87 Ethereum worth $2,262.
An unidentified cryptocurrency user was found to have accidentally spent $90,000 in gas fees on a $2,200 Ethereum (ETH) transfer.
According to data from Ethereum explorer Etherscan, an anonymous user accidentally paid 34.26 ETH ($89,200) in ETH gas fees while transferring 0.87 ETH worth $2,262.
In the crypto world, so-called “fat finger” transactions are common. In 2023, an NFT trader paid 1,055 ETH (worth $1.6 million at the time) for an NFT that cost just $1,000.
An OpenSea collector also spent 100 ETH ($191,000 at the time) for a free NFT mint.
Retail participants aren’t the only ones making mistakes with transfers. In 2021, Singapore-based crypto exchange Crypto.com also accidentally sent $7 million to Australian user Thevamanogari Manivel.
Apart from these, in 2021, Bitfinex also moved $100,000 worth of Tether to a wallet and from there sent it to the wallet of the DeversiFi exchange, which was separated from it in 2019, and Bitfinex paid a transaction fee of $23.7 million for this transfer.
” ]
Experts have warned that such overcharging could be accidental, but could also be a method of money laundering.
Additionally, the Ethereum network's daily ETH burn rate and gas fees dropped to their lowest levels this year.
Ethereum, which has experienced a 3.5% drop in the last 24 hours, continues to be traded at $2,584 at the time of writing.
*This is not investment advice.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Russia Pushes Crypto Tax Reform Amid Bitcoin Surge
However, Russian miners of cryptocurrencies will be exempt from paying VAT (Value Added Tax) on the coins they mine.
XRP Lawsuit: US Judge Approves Ripple’s Judgment Request
Judge Phyllis Hamilton approved a joint request from both parties to move forward with the final judgment while maintaining a stay on the plaintiff’s class claims.
The Solana ecosystem has a lot to be thankful for this year
Let’s raise a toast to another year of SOLid progress