Ripple CLO Highlights SEC’s Overreach in Potential OpenSea Lawsuit
- Ripple CLO cites 1976 SEC ruling to defend NFTs as non-securities in the OpenSea case.
- OpenSea receives Wells Notice from SEC, signaling possible securities classification for NFTs.
- SEC criticized for ‘regulation by enforcement,’ impacting innovation in digital assets sector.
Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, warned that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission could target OpenSea. He based his argument on a 1976 decision in which the SEC determined that art galleries that market art, which can be viewed as an investment vehicle or art, are exempt from registering as security dealers.
Read CRYPTONEWSLAND on google newsAlderoty suggests this should also apply to non-fungible tokens (NFTs), often traded more like artworks than financial securities. The Ripple CLO argues that precedent should shield OpenSea from any lawsuit classifying NFTs as securities.
OpenSea has received a Wells Notice from the SEC indicating that some NFTs traded on its platform may be securities subject to stricter regulation. CEO Devin Finzer is concerned about an unfair focus on artists and creators, while critics, including influential crypto community members and political figures, view this as overregulation.
Political and Public Backlash
The regulator has also been criticized for its approach, not just by business leaders but even by political figures. U.S. Congressman Wiley Nickel criticized the SEC’s strategy as one of “regulation by enforcement,” stating that it was eroding trust in the regulatory space and killing innovation in digital assets.
Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban, for his part, has blamed SEC Chair Gary Gensler for much of the haphazard regulatory oversight amid increased frustration from stakeholders within the digital economy.
Regulatory Actions
The most critical debate is whether NFTs should be classified as securities. It could decide how most other digital assets are regulated within the U.S.
An aggressive SEC on these crypto projects, despite previous defeats in court, including cases against firms like Ripple Labs, means that the outcome of any potential lawsuit against OpenSea could have broad implications for the NFT market and beyond.
disclaimer read moreCrypto News Land, also abbreviated as "CNL", is an independent media entity - we are not affiliated with any company in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry. We aim to provide fresh and relevant content that will help build up the crypto space since we believe in its potential to impact the world for the better. All of our news sources are credible and accurate as we know it, although we do not make any warranty as to the validity of their statements as well as their motive behind it. While we make sure to double-check the veracity of information from our sources, we do not make any assurances as to the timeliness and completeness of any information in our website as provided by our sources. Moreover, we disclaim any information on our website as investment or financial advice. We encourage all visitors to do your own research and consult with an expert in the relevant subject before making any investment or trading decision.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
PNUT whale sold 4.28 million tokens for 7,850 SOL yesterday, earning $25.1 million
A whale earned $16.8 million in one week through Pnut and FRED
German company Deutsche Telekom has become a validator of the NEAR blockchain