SEC Secures Court Ruling Declaring Green United’s Mining Devices as Securities
- A federal court ruled Green United’s crypto mining devices are securities, supporting the SEC’s fraud allegations.
- The SEC claims Green United misled investors, as their mining devices did not mine tokens but distributed worthless ones.
- The court sided with the SEC, applying the Howey test to classify Green United’s Green Boxes and hosting agreements as securities.
The SEC scored the biggest court victory over Green United LLC, with a federal court ruling that the firm’s cryptocurrency mining devices, otherwise known as Green Boxes, were securities.
The U.S. Court for the District of Utah, presided over by Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen, ruled in favor of fraud allegations filed by the agency against Green United.
SEC Alleges Fraud in Green United’s Operations
The agency filed a complaint against Green United, alleging the firm had lied to investors about how much profit they’d make with its Green Boxes. According to the complaint, Green United claimed the devices were designed to mine digital tokens. However, the agency argued that no mining ever occurred.
What occurred was that Green United issued unmined tokens, called GREEN, with no value whatsoever in any secondary market.
Judge Sides on Securities Classification
Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen ruled against them, accepting the complainant’s argument. She found the Green Boxes and hosting agreements collectively constituted a security under the Howey test.
Read CRYPTONEWSLAND on google newsThe SEC made good on its burden of showing that investors were promised high-yield returns, an inducement to invest, and thus an investment contract. The SEC win comes as the agency faces scrutiny by the Congress over its regulation policies.
Green United’s Defense Against SEC Claims
In response, Green United claimed that no investors had actually lost money. IN addition, they argued that the SEC was wrong in labeling hosted mining as a security . The firm also claimed that hosted mining was quite common among publicly traded companies. The court, however, rejected all such claims by Green United to dismiss the case.
By the court’s ruling in favor of the SEC, it means Green United is still facing some legal problems concerning its alleged fraudulent acts. Such decisions highlight the SEC’s closer scrutiny of cryptocurrency companies. They aim to ensure compliance with securities laws.
disclaimer read moreCrypto News Land, also abbreviated as "CNL", is an independent media entity - we are not affiliated with any company in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry. We aim to provide fresh and relevant content that will help build up the crypto space since we believe in its potential to impact the world for the better. All of our news sources are credible and accurate as we know it, although we do not make any warranty as to the validity of their statements as well as their motive behind it. While we make sure to double-check the veracity of information from our sources, we do not make any assurances as to the timeliness and completeness of any information in our website as provided by our sources. Moreover, we disclaim any information on our website as investment or financial advice. We encourage all visitors to do your own research and consult with an expert in the relevant subject before making any investment or trading decision.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
3 reasons why Ethereum price is headed toward $4K
Relaxed Regulations Open Doors for Blockchain Innovation, Says a16z Crypto
ETH 3.0: Sharding may return to scale Ethereum to millions of TPS
Canary Capital applies to launch spot HBAR exchange-traded product